SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1588

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
G. Dorairaj – Appellant
Versus
J. Janabai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.R.K. Bhavanantham
For the Respondent: N. Bhaskaran

Table of Content
1. facts of loan, promissory note, cheque dishonour under ni act. (Para 2)
2. appellant's arguments: technical error rectified, defences afterthought. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. respondent's defence: misuse of cheque, contradictions fatal. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

1. The respondent convicted by judgment dated 11.12.2018 in C.C.No.5846 of 2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore, Chennai (trial Court) and sentenced to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment and to pay the compensation of Rs.3,30,000/- to the appellant in default to undergo two months Simple Imprisonment. Challenging the same, the respondent preferred an appeal before the learned XX Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai (lower appellate Court) in Crl.A.No.22 of 2019 and the same was allowed on 26.10.2021 setting aside the judgment of conviction of the trial Court. Against the same, the present Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant.

2. Gist of the case is that the appellant and the respondent known to each other for the past several years and both working in Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, having good acquaintance the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top