Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Sahin Miah – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, PEW Anna Nagar, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks bail post-arrest for ndps offence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution counters on abscondence risk. (Para 4) |
| 3. court finds arrest timing flaws justify section 37 exception. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. bail granted with stringent conditions. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
22.07.2025 for the alleged offence under Section 8(c), r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act in Crime No.91 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.
3(a).The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 22.07.2025 for the alleged possession of 20.282 kilograms of Ganja. According to the prosecution case, on 22.07.2025 when the police intercepted the petitioner, they have found two packets each contains 10.240 kilograms and 10.042 kilograms of Ganja in total 20.282 kilograms of Ganja and thereafter, they remanded the accused to the judicial custody. It is the specific contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the two packets of Ganja, w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
