Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
District Collector Krishnagiri District – Appellant
Versus
M. Thiagaraju – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of delay condonation petition and prior proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. official duties insufficient for delay excuse (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. precedent bars condonation for government red-tape (Para 6) |
| 4. dismissal for lack of sufficient cause (Para 7 , 8) |
COMMON ORDER
This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of
7374 days in filing the second appeal.
2. It is seen from the records that the father of the respondent, namely, Madhanagiriyappa filed a suit in O.S.No.127 of 1997 on the file of Sub Court, Hosur seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction. The said suit was partly decreed in favour of the respondent’s father, granting decree for permanent injunction and the prayer for declaration was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner’s father filed first appeal in A.S.No.35 of 2004 on the file of Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri at Dharmapuri. The first appellate court granted decree, declaring the title of the respondent’s father. Therefore, the suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the respondent’s father was decreed in toto.
3. A perusal of records shows that the judgment and decree in A.S.No.35 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
