SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Karthikeyan Electricals, Represented by its Proprietor, Ramanathan Kanagavel – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, West Range - I, Madurai - I Division – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.6134 & 6136 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.R.Ananth
For Respondent: Mr.R.Gowrishankar, Standing Counsel

Section 16(5) CGST Act permits ITC claims for 2017-2021 if GSTR-3B filed by 30.11.2021, overriding Section 16(4).

Headnote:Section 16(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 permits taxpayers to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for financial years 2017-2018 to 2020-2021 if GSTR-3B returns filed by 30.11.2021, overriding Section 16(4) time limit. Petitioner availed ITC of Rs.17,35,012/- for FY 2018-19 after initial due date under Section 39 but filed GSTR-3B return on 30.09.2020. Respondent passed orders disallowing ITC without considering amendment. Court found impugned orders failed to account for Section 16(5) extension, rendering ITC availment timely. Issues framed around validity of ITC disallowance post-amendment to Section 16. Ratio holds that amended Section 16(5) validates ITC claims where returns filed by extended deadline of 30.11.2021, superseding prior time bars. Writ petition allowed; impugned orders set aside and matter remanded for fresh consideration per Section 16(5).

Table of Content
1. challenges gst orders disallowing late itc claim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. section 16(5) validates itc if gstr-3b filed by 30.11.2021. (Para 3)
3. orders quashed; remanded for fresh consideration. (Para 4)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.6134 & 6136 of 2026 Karthikeyan Electricals, Represented by its Proprietor, Ramanathan Kanagavel, No.81, Hot Water Channel Road, Ponnagaram, Madurai, Tamil Nadu - 625 001. ... Petitioner Vs.

The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, West Range - I, Madurai - I Division, No.5 V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai - 625 002. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records on the file of the respondent in impugned Order-in-Original No.43/2024 GST (Madurai West Range) in DIN-20240359XO0000888C23 dated 18.03.2024 and Form GST DRC-07 Summary of the Order in Reference No.ZD330424241588B dated 29.04.2024 passed for the F.Y.2018-19 and consequential impugned Rectification Order in Reference No.ZD3301261386796 passed in GSTIN/Temp. ID 33AHTPK6117A1ZL dated 27.01.2026 by the respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Section 16(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and violative of principles of natural justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ananth For Respondent : Mr.R.Gowrishankar Standing Counsel

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned Order-in-

Original No.43/2024 GST (Madurai West Range) in DIN-20240359XO0000888C23 dated 18.03.2024 and Form GST DRC-07 Summary of the Order in Reference No.ZD330424241588B dated 29.04.2024 passed for the F.Y.2018-19 and consequential impugned Rectification Order in Reference No.ZD3301261386796 passed in GSTIN/Temp. ID 33AHTPK6117A1ZL dated 27.01.2026.

2. The impugned orders have been passed on the ground that the petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of Rs.17,35,012/- after the due date for furnishing the return in Form GSTR-3B under Section 39 of the CGST Act.

3. Upon perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and after hearing the learned counsel on either side, it is evident that, by introducing an amendment to Section 16 of the Act in the form of Section 16(5), the Government has permitted taxpayers to claim ITC for the financial years 2017–2018 to 2020–2021, provided that GSTR-3B returns were filed on or before 30.11.2021, thereby overriding the time limit prescribed under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act. In the present case, the petitioner had filed GSTR-3B returns for the relevant period on 30.09.2020 and therefore, the availment of ITC pertaining to the financial year 2018–2019 is to be treated as within time, since the return was filed on or before 30.11.2021. However, the impugned orders were passed without taking this into consideration.

4. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:-

i. The impugned orders shall stand set aside and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent for fresh consideration.

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent without fail and file reply and file such documents before the respondent.

iii.The respondent, after taking into consideration the observations made supra, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

iv. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top