Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
T.S.Vinoth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to property tax demand violating civil decree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. corporation claims compliance via fresh assessment. (Para 3) |
| 3. decree binds; no show cause notice issued post-inspection. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. impugned order set aside; fresh procedure mandated. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.P.(MD)No.7221 of 2026 T.S.Vinoth Kumar ... Petitioner -vs-
1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Corporation Building, Madurai - 625 002.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone-II (North), Madurai Corporation, Madurai - 625 007. ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned communication issued by the second respondent herein in Ma2Aa4B4/001542/2026 signed on 25.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents to refix the property tax pertaining to the petitioner's house property with old assessment No.115/10760, new assessment No.115/033/900814, in Ward No.WD033, Madurai Corporation by following the decree dated 10.04.2023 passed in O.S.No.621 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
