SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
A.Naif Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD)No.7374 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents:Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate

Court directs consideration of bond-based employment representation within stipulated time frame.

Headnote:The petitioner executed a bond during postgraduate studies in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, undertaking to serve the State Government for two years post-completion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Essential facts include completion of degree in December 2025 and representation on 20.03.2026 for employment, which remained unaddressed. The court noted the government's undertaking to consider the representation. The issue framed was enforcement of bond obligations for employment in available vacancies. The ratio decidendi emphasized timely consideration of representations in accordance with law, directing posting within six weeks. The writ petition is disposed of with directions to the second respondent to issue appropriate posting orders within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's bond obligation for state service post-pg degree. (Para 1 , 2)
2. government's undertaking to consider representation. (Para 3)
3. direction for posting within six weeks; petition disposed. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint him in an available vacancy in terms of the bond executed by him.

2. The petitioner, while pursuing his M.D.S. in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, executed a bond undertaking that, upon completion of the postgraduate degree, he would serve the State Government for a maximum period of two years, during which time his original certificates could be retained. The petitioner completed his postgraduate degree in December 2025 and thereafter submitted a representation dated 20.03.2026 requesting the respondents to provide employment in terms of the bond executed by him. The grievance of the petitioner is that, till date, no posting has been provided by the State Government, thereby preventing him from fulfilling the obligation undertaken in the bond.

3. Mr. N. Ramesh Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner’s representation will be considered in accordance with law within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. The said submission is placed on record.

4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 20.03.2026 and issue appropriate posting orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top