SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30163

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
G. Selvi – Appellant
Versus
Sridev Prakash – Respondent
CRP NO. 6154 OF 2025|CMP No. 8263 of 2026



Important Points

Court granted limited two-month extension for tenant vacation, balancing needs against decree enforcement.

Subject

Civil - Execution

Headnote

First Paragraph: No specific statutes analyzed. The petitioners sought extension of time granted in prior order dated 17.12.2025 in CRP No.6154 of 2025 to vacate premises till July 2026. Court considered submissions for six months additional time needed. Court found two months sufficient considering respondent's age and decree enforcement delay. Second Paragraph: Issue framed as whether to extend vacation time beyond prior order. Ratio: Balancing tenant's request against landlord's prolonged wait, court limited extension to ensure prompt vacation. Third Paragraph: Petition allowed with two months further time to vacate; failure permits execution proceedings.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.Lavan, J.Balamurugan, N.Premnath

Table of Content
1. petition seeks time extension for prior court order. (Para 1)
2. petitioner requests six months to vacate premises. (Para 2)
3. respondent objects due to landlord's age and delay. (Para 3)
4. court grants two months extension or execution permitted. (Para 4)

ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to extend the time granted by this Court in its order dated 17.12.2025 passed in C.R.P.No.6154 of 2025 by granting further time till July, 2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner needs six month time to vacate the premises.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent raised objection stating that the landlord is aged about 70 years till date she is not able to realise the fruits of the decree.

4. Considering the fact of the case, this Court is inclined to give further two months time to vacate the premises and to hand over the key to the respondent, failing which, the respondent is entitled to take appropriate steps to vacate the petitioner through execution proceedings. Accordingly this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top