Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, K.Govindarajanthilakavadi, JJ
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
L.Dhanaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. noted death of respondent and granted time for steps. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal for failure to substitute legal representatives. (Para 2 , 3) |
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 05.02.2026, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the first respondent died and that the matter was directed to be listed in the first week of March 2026 for taking necessary steps.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is seen that no steps have been taken by the petitioners till date to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent, despite sufficient opportunity having been granted.
3. In view of the failure on the part of the petitioners to take necessary steps within the time granted, the writ petition stands dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
