Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Suresh Kumar, N.Senthilkumar, JJ
Subramaniyan – Appellant
Versus
Balamurugan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of review against dismissed appeal and slp. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. no error found in impugned order. (Para 5) |
| 3. review barred post-slp dismissal; application dismissed. (Para 6) |
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This review application has been filed against the order passed by the Division Bench dated 05.01.2024 in A.S.No.202 of 2017.
2. In fact, the said appeal suit was filed against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1 of 2012 dated 08.02.2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Perambalur.
3. The Division Bench having considered the merits of the case, especially, the judgment of the trial Court has come to the conclusion that, the judgment of the trial Court does not deserve to be interfered with, therefore, the appeal was dismissed, as against which, the appellants preferred Special Leave Petition in SLP(Civil) Diary No.7317 of 2024 in the matter of Subramaniyan & others Vs. Balamurugan & another and the said Special Leave Petition came to be dismissed by order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 01.04.2024, which reads thus: “Delay condoned.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, we do not find any reas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
