Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30382
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
P.Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
Jayanthi – Respondent
Cont P.No.2513 of 2023 | W.A.No.1868 of 2022
Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.Balan Haridas
For Respondent: Mrs.Madhuri Donti Reddy Special Government Pleader Standing Counsel
For Petitioner: Mr.Balan Haridas
For Respondent: Mrs.Madhuri Donti Reddy Special Government Pleader Standing Counsel
Court closed contempt petition upon submission of compliance report confirming adherence to prior order.
Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful violation of the order dated 11.10.2022 in W.A.No.1868 of 2022. The respondents submitted a compliance report confirming adherence to the order. The court accepted the compliance and closed the proceedings. Second Paragraph: The issue framed was whether the respondents violated the prior order wilfully. The court's reasoning relied on the produced compliance report, confirming full compliance. Third Paragraph: Contempt Petition stands closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged wilful violation of prior order. (Para 1) |
| 2. compliance report confirms order adherence. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for wilfully and deliberately violating the order dated 11.10.2022 passed in W.A.No.1868 of 2022.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents produced a compliance report and submitted that the order dated 11.10.2022 passed in W.A.No.1868 of 2022 has been complied with.
3. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed.
