SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30436

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J
Thangarasu @ Raja – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Jeeyapuram Police Station Trichy District – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition CRL RC(MD) No.623 of 2026 | Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 | Crime No.624/2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner:Mr.S.Sathyachidambaram, Advocate
For Respondent: Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Interim custody of seized vehicle granted due to risk of deterioration outweighing retention value.

Headnote:The petition challenges dismissal of application for interim custody of seized vehicle in offence under Section 303(2) BNS, 2023 read with Section 21(4) MMDR Act, 1957 for illegal mineral transport. Prosecution registered FIR, seized vehicle; magistrate denied return. Court finds vehicle deterioration in custody serves no purpose. Issues framed: risk of reuse in offence vs. depreciation. Ratio: interim custody granted considering value loss outweighs retention risks, subject to conditions. Revision allowed; order set aside; vehicle returned for interim custody.

Table of Content
1. fir for illegal mining; vehicle seized; magistrate denied custody. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on reuse risk vs. vehicle deterioration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. custody granted with conditions to prevent deterioration. (Para 7)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District, in Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 dated 17.03.2026 filed by the petitioner under Section

497 of BNSS of 2023.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.624 of 2025 for an alleged offence under Sections 303(2) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, for illegal transport of mines in an Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry vehicle, bearing registration No. TN 15 W 5247. Subsequently, the petitioner's vehicle was seized. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 for the return of vehicle before the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District, and the same was dismissed on 17.03.2026.

3. The petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 17.03.2026 made in Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District, and to set aside the same.

4. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that if the vehicle is returned to the petitioner, there is possibility for the vehicle being used for the commission of similar offence and objected to grant interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the vehicle bearing Registration No. TN 15 W 5247 is owned by the petitioner and he was not involved in any such offence as alleged by the respondent and if the vehicle is kept in open place, the vehicle will get deteriorated and the value of the vehicle would automatically stand diminished and therefore interim custody of the vehicle may be granted to the petitioner.

7. Considering the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and that no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is inclined to allow the revision thereby, setting aside the impugned order dated 17.03.2026 passed in Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 by the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. 8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the order dated 17.03.2026, passed in Crl MP No.2776 of 2026 by the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District, is hereby set aside and the vehicle viz., Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry vehicle, bearing registration No. TN 15 W 5247, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concerned Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rupees One Lakh only) as non-refundable deposit for the said vehicle to the credit of WAA Cornelia Sorabjee Lecture Series, A/C No.

6687756541, IFSC Code:IDIB000H040;

(b) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.8,00,000/-

(Rupees Eight Lakhs only), with two sureties for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District;

(c) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle before the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District. If the original RC Book is in the custody of the finance company, the petitioner shall produce a photocopy of the RC Book, along with an affidavit stating that the original is with the finance company and a letter from the finance company acknowledging such custody.

(d) The petitioner shall give an undertaking befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top