IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Hemalatha – Appellant
Versus
M.Muthulakshmi – Respondent
Rev.APLC(MD)Sr.No.89334 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeline of judgment delivery and copy receipt (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petition dismissed; review rejected at sr stage (Para 3) |
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 901 days in filing Review Application.
2.It is seen from the records, the judgment and decree in the Second Appeal was passed on 27.02.2023. The copy application was made on 28.02.2023 and copies were made ready on 31.05.2023. It is also seen the copies were delivered to appellants on 24.07.2023. In the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, it was stated by the petitioners that petitioners 1 and 2 were out of station and hence, they could not contact the counsel and due to the communication gap there was a delay.
3.As mentioned earlier, immediately after disposal of the Second Appeal, the copy application was immediately filed on 28.02.2023 and the copies were made ready on 31.05.2023. However, the Review application has been filed by the petitioners only on 15.10.2025. The delay is 901 days. The vague reason given by the petitioners is the communication gap between the petitioners and the Advocate. Communication gap cannot be the sufficient cause for condoning the huge delay of 901 days. Since, the petitioners failed to make out any sufficient cause to condone the delay, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. The Review Application is rejected in SR stage itself.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.