SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30643

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. Swaminathan, R. Poornima, JJ
Koodalingam – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.J.Anandkumar
For Respondents:Mr.S.Vinodh Government Advocate

Table of Content
1. violation of natural justice warrants setting aside order. (Para 2)
2. writ petition allowed with remand and no costs. (Para 3)

Heard both sides.

2.The impugned order is set aside on the sole ground of violation of principles of natural justice. The matter is remitted to the file of the second respondent to act as per law.

3.With the aforesaid liberty, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top