SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30651

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
Santhoshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Melakkal Main Road, Kochadai, Madurai District – Respondent
Writ Petition | MD1066500706426



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Suresh Kannan
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan Central Government Standing Counsel, Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Mere FIR registration does not bar passport issuance under Section 6 of Passports Act, 1967; requires pending court proceedings.

Headnote:Under Section 6 of the Passports Act, 1967, passport authorities may refuse issuance or renewal only on specified grounds, including pending criminal proceedings before a competent court. Petitioner applied for passport renewal, but application was withheld due to registered FIR. Court found mere FIR registration does not constitute pending proceedings under the Act. Issue framed: Whether withholding passport renewal solely on FIR registration aligns with Section 6. Ratio: Statutory bar applies only when proceedings are pending in court, not upon mere FIR; refusal based solely on FIR is invalid. Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to process and issue passport within four weeks, subject to eligibility criteria.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for passport renewal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. criminal case registered against petitioner. (Para 3)
3. fir alone insufficient to refuse passport under section 6. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. writ allowed; process passport within four weeks. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to renew his passport based on his application in File No. MD1066500706426 dated 05.03.2026.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, though he has submitted an application for issuance of passport, the same has not been processed by the first respondent. According to the petitioner, the application has been kept pending on the ground that criminal cases have been registered against him.

3. Mr. M. Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), appearing for the respondent 2, on receiving instructions, submitted that a criminal case has been registered against the petitioner.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. The refusal to issue or renew a passport is governed by the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Under Section 6 of the Act, the Passport Authority is empowered to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport only on the grounds specifically enumerated therein. One such ground is where proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a competent criminal court in India.

6. In the present case, the only reason cited by the respondents is the registration of FIR against the petitioner. However, mere registration of FIR does not fall within the grounds contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The statutory bar arises only when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court.

7. Therefore, the action of the first respondent in withholding the petitioner’s application solely on the basis of the registration of FIR is not in consonance with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967.

8. In view of the above, this Court finds merit in the petitioner’s contention.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, and the first respondent is directed to process the petitioner’s application for renewal of passport in File No. MD1066500706426 dated 05.03.2026 and issue the passport, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria prescribed under law.

10. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

11. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top