Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Kalaimani – Appellant
Versus
S.Santhi – Respondent
Contempt Petition | W.P.(MD) No.12843 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. government communicated for pension particulars pre-petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. contempt dismissed due to absence of willful disobedience. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, learned Additional Government Pleader states that even prior to the filing of the Contempt Petition, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs has addressed a communication to the petitioner on 03.11.2025, calling for various particulars, enabling them to process the petitioner's application for pension. Therefore, he states that the question of contempt does not arise, since the petitioner has not replied to the said communication. A copy of the said communication is also handed over to the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2.Recording the same, the Contempt Petition is dismissed, without prejudice to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
