Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
R.Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
S.Ganesh Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges denial of cross-examination permission. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties dispute jural relationship and lease validity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. family occupation and rent payments examined. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. revision dismissed upholding trial court order. (Para 8) |
ORDER
Challenging the order passed in MP No.2 of 2024 the petitioner has filed the above revision.
2. Before the trial Court, the petitioner has filed an application in MP No.2 of 2024 praying to permit him to cross examine P.W.1 and the same was dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed the present revision.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent/landlord has initiated RLTOP proceedings for other shops which are not under his occupation and clubbing all other properties, the respondent has filed a petition which is not permissible and the petitioner is paying rent to the sister of the landlord and as on date there is no arrears of rent and therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays to set aside the order passed by the trial court.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that originally in the year 2003, lease agre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
