SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30768

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
Madhubala – Appellant
Versus
R.Navvin Ram – Respondent
Tr.C.M.P.(MD)Nos.608 and 609 of 2025 | C.M.P.(MD)Nos.17405 and 17406 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.T.Venkatesan
For Respondent: Mr.R.Ramasamy

Wife's convenience prioritised in matrimonial transfer petitions under Section 24 CPC.

Headnote:Under Section 24 C.P.C., transfer petitions were filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.Nos.1251 of 2024 and 533 of 2024 from Family Court, Madurai, to Subordinate Court, Melur. Marriage solemnized on 12.09.2022 per Hindu rites; parties living separately with cross-petitions for divorce and restitution of conjugal rights pending in Madurai, alongside DV and maintenance cases in Melur. Court found petitioner's residence and practice in Melur justified transfer for convenience. Issues framed around convenience for hearings given petitioner's relocation to Melur and respondent's prior appearances there. Ratio: Supreme Court in analogous case emphasized wife's convenience in matrimonial transfers, considering socioeconomic factors and livelihood. Court declined to probe merits of mutual allegations at transfer stage. Transfer petitions allowed; cases ordered withdrawn from Family Court, Madurai, and transferred to Subordinate Court, Melur, for joint adjudication.

Table of Content
1. undisputed facts of marriage, separation, and pending cross-cases. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. parties' contentions on convenience and harassment. (Para 7 , 8 , 11)
3. court observations and supreme court precedent on wife's convenience. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
4. transfer ordered to melur for joint trial. (Para 13 , 14)

COMMON ORDER

The above two transfer petitions are filed to withdraw the cases from the file of the Family Court, Madurai, in H.M.O.P.Nos.1251 of 2024 and 533 of 2024 and transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Melur, Madurai District.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 12.09.2022 at Gurukrishna Kalyana Mahal, Palanganatham, Madurai, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs and that subsequently there arose some misunderstanding between them and they are living separately.

4. It is not in dispute that the respondent filed a petition claiming divorce in H.M.O.P.No.533 of 2024 and the same is pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner has also filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.1251 of 2024 seeking restitution of conjugal rights and the same is also pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.

5. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has initiated proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act in D.V.C.No.12 of 2025 and the maintenance case in M.C.No.18 of 2025 and that the same are pending before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Melur.

6. It is evident from the records that the respondent filed a petition in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15844 of 2025 seeking transfer of the case in M.C.No. 18 of 2025 from the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Melur to the file of the Family Court, Madurai and this Court, by observing that two HMOPs are pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai and all these cases including the petition filed by the respondent before the Judicial Magistrate, Melur, have to be tried together, has granted an order of interim stay for further proceedings in M.C.No.18 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur.

7. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is now residing at Melur, Madurai District along with her parents and and finds it difficult to travel to Madurai to attend the hearings.

8. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the respondent had earlier filed a transfer petition seeking transfer of the maintenance case from the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur, to the Family Court, Madurai, to be tried along with the two HMOPs pending in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15844 of 2025. It is further contended that the present transfer petitions filed by the petitioner, seeking transfer to the Subordinate Court, Melur, are only an afterthought, motivated by vindictiveness. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner is residing at Melur, which is at a distance of about 20 kilometres from Madurai, and her father, who is working as a Head Postmaster at Madurai, is commuting daily from Melur to Madurai Head Post Office. It is therefore contended that the petitioner has filed the present petitions with a view to harass the respondent, and that no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner if the HMOPs are proceeded with before the Family Court, Madurai.

9. It is pertinent to note that both the petitioner and the respondent have levelled allegations and counter allegations against each other. However, having regard to the nature and scope of the present transfer petitions, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of such rival allegations at this stage.

10. As already pointed out, proceedings initiated under the Domestic Violence Act in D.V.C.No.12 of 2025 and the maintenance case in M.C.No.18 of 2025 are pending before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Melur and that the responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top