Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Velmurugan, K. Govindaraj Thilakavadi, JJ
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
R.Manickam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. retired mistry's pay scale and pension claim history. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments on cut-off date vs. redesignation benefits. (Para 4) |
| 3. redesignation entitles pension refixation for retirees. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. uphold tribunal; dismiss writ; direct compliance. (Para 8 , 9) |
(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN,J.)
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, re-fixing the 1st respondent’s basic pension together with all consequential benefits and arrears.
2.The brief facts of the case is that the 1st respondent herein was appointed as Khalasi in the year 1963 and thereafter, he was promoted to various posts and subsequently retired on 30.09.1996 on attaining the age of superannuation. At the time of retirement, he was holding the post of Mistry in the pay scale of Rs.1400- 2300 (IV Pay Commission), which is equivalent to the pay scale of Rs.4500-7000 as per V Pay Commission. The 1st respondent has sought for upgradation of his pay scale from Rs.4500-7000 to Rs.5000-8000 based on the DOP&PW OM dated 28.01.2013. However, since the petitioners have not considered his request, the 1st respondent filed an Original Applicat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
