IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, K.Govindarajanthilakavadi, JJ
K.Sundara Gounder – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition under nh act for road expansion. (Para 2) |
| 2. inadequate compensation ignoring potentiality and statutory benefits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. limited scope of interference in arbitral awards. (Para 6) |
| 4. awards perverse for omitting solatium/interest and potentiality. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. set aside orders and remit for fresh consideration. (Para 12) |
(Judgment of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.)
Challenging the order passed in Arb.O.P.No.177 of 2013, dated
27.01.2021 by the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram, appellant has filed the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant is the owner of 3 ½ acres of land in S.No.265/4B, situated at Thenkeeranur Village at Kallakurichi Taluk. On 09.07.2008 a notification under Section 3A(1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘NH Act’] was published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary No.946 by the first respondent, namely the National Highways Authority of India, for acquisition of lands in the Thenkeeranur Village to facilitate expansion of NH-68 four-lane road. Pursuant thereto, the second respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.