SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
P.Valliappan – Appellant
Versus
Ms.J.Mahaveer Jayanthi – Respondent
Contempt Petition | W.P.No.46354 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Selvaraj
For the Respondents: Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh

Compliance with court order via subsequent representation consideration discharges contempt proceedings.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of the court's order dated 02.12.2025 in W.P.No.46354 of 2025. The respondent represented compliance through an order dated 09.02.2026 considering the petitioner's representation. The court found the original order complied with, closing the petition. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was whether the respondent wilfully disobeyed the prior court order. The court noted the standing counsel's representation and production of the compliance order, holding that compliance was achieved. Third Paragraph: Contempt Petition stands closed.

Table of Content
1. alleged wilful disobedience of prior court order (Para 1)
2. compliance confirmed, contempt petition closed (Para 2)

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Respondent for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court dated 02.12.2025 in W.P.No.46354 of 2025.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Selvaraj For Contemnor(s): Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh

O R D E R

This Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the Respondent for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court dated 02.12.2025 in W.P.No.46354 of 2025.

2. It is represented by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, the representation of the petitioner was considered by passing order dated

09.02.2026 and also produced a copy of the same.

3. In the light of the above, the order of this Court has been complied with.

Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top