SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30911

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
M/s.Ruby Power Generation (P) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Radhakrishnan – Respondent
Contempt Petition|W.P.No.48053 of 2025



Important Points

Contempt petition closed upon respondents' submission of compliance with prior court order.

Subject

Contempt - Civil Contempt

Act Referred

Headnote

First Paragraph: Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 governs the petition filed for non-compliance with the court order dated 09.12.2025 in W.P.No.48053 of 2025. The petitioner alleged disobedience by respondents from power distribution entities. The court noted counsel's submission of compliance during hearing. Second Paragraph: The issue framed was whether the order dated 09.12.2025 was complied with. The court's reasoning accepted the respondents' submission of compliance without further inquiry. Third Paragraph: Contempt Petition closed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Saravanakumar
For the Respondents: Mr.D.R.Arunkumar

Table of Content
1. contempt filed for non-compliance with prior order. (Para 2)

O R D E R

For non-compliance of the order of this Court, dated 09.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.48053 of 2025, the contempt petition is filed.

2. Today, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, the order of this Court dated

09.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.48053 of 2025 has been complied with.

3. In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top