Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
Shyam – Appellant
Versus
Mrs. D. Boovarasi, The District Registrar (Admin), O/o. District Registration Department, Marthandam, Kanniyakumari District – Respondent
Cont P.(MD)No.130 of 2026 | W.P.(MD).No.21783 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's prior direction to consider application per supreme court precedent. (Para 1) |
| 2. no contempt found; petition closed with liberty to challenge. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
This Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application in the light of the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Esjaypee Inspects Private Limited Vs. AGM and AO, Canara Bank, reported in 2021(2) CTC 493. Now, the respondent has passed an order dated 30.01.2026 rejecting the claim of the petitioner.
2. Hence, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no contempt as alleged. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the rejection order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
