Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Lawrence
For the Respondents:Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate

Contempt petition closed as matter became infructuous per petitioner's counsel.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, proceedings were initiated for alleged willful disobedience of the order dated 11.12.2024 in W.P(MD)No.3115 of 2021. The petitioner filed a contempt petition claiming non-compliance by the contemnor, the Commissioner of Melur Municipality. The Court noted counsel's submission that the matter had become infructuous. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was whether contempt proceedings should continue given the changed circumstances. The Court accepted the statement that the matter was infructuous, rendering further proceedings unnecessary. Last Paragraph: This Contempt Petition is closed.

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous.

2.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :