Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
Saffik Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep., by The Sub Inspector of Police, Mettupalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek quashing of fir for unauthorized protest. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. protest as constitutional right; no traffic block or prohibitory order. (Para 3) |
| 3. prosecution: investigation needed post-registration. (Para 4) |
| 4. no offence in peaceful dissent; police fir invalid. (Para 5) |
| 5. fir quashed against petitioners. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioners, who are accused in FIR in Crime No.139 of 2025 for offences under Sections 189(2) & 126(2) BNS on the file of the respondent police, have filed the Quash Petition.
2. The gist of the case is that the respondent / complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioners stating that on 20.03.2025 at 10.00 a.m., the respondent and other police officers were patrolling near Annajirav Road. At that time, the petitioners and other accused were protesting against the ED police officials in connection with a raid at the residence of the SDPI District General Secretary. The petitioners and other accused had conducted the protest without obtaining due permission from the authorities. Based on the complaint of the respondent, a case in Crime No.139 of 2025 for offences under Sections 189(2) & 126(2) BNS against the petitioners.
3.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
