SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
Mohamed Ashik – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By the Sub Inspector of Police, Cumbum North Police Station, Theni District – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition|Crime No.148 of 2024|Crl.M.P.No.986 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.M.Veeravelpandi
For Respondent:Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate

Interim custody of seized vehicle granted despite offence risk, prioritizing prevention of deterioration on conditions.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Relevant provisions include Sections 272, 273, 353, 506(1) of IPC, Sections 6(b), 24(1) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, Section 497 BNSS, 2023. Prosecution alleged illegal transport of tobacco products using seized vehicle, leading to dismissal of petitioner's application for vehicle return by Magistrate. Court found that retaining vehicle in open custody would cause deterioration without serving purpose. Second Paragraph: Issues framed around interim custody of vehicle pending trial, balancing risk of reoffending against depreciation. Ratio decidendi: No purpose served by retaining vehicle in custody exposing it to elements, justifying interim release on conditions. Third Paragraph: Criminal Revision allowed, impugned order set aside, vehicle ordered returned for interim custody subject to specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. fir for illegal tobacco transport, vehicle seized, magistrate dismissed return application (Para 2 , 3)
2. court weighs custody purpose against depreciation (Para 4 , 7)
3. respondent fears reoffending, petitioner urges against vehicle deterioration (Para 5 , 6)
4. revision allowed, vehicle released on strict conditions (Para 8)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, in Crl.M.P.No.986 of 2025 dated

22.09.2025 filed by the petitioner under Section 497 of BNSS of 2023.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent filed an FIR in Crime No.148 of 2024 for an alleged offence under Sections 272, 273, 353 & 506(1) of IPC and Sections 6(b) and 24(1) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, for illegal transport of tobacco products through Maruti Car bearing registration No.TN 60 BY 2713. Subsequently, the petitioner's vehicle was seized. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.986 of 2025 for the return of vehicle before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, and the same was dismissed on 22.09.2025.

3. The petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 22.09.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No. 986 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, and to set aside the same.

4. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that if the vehicle is returned to the petitioner, there is possibility for the vehicle being used for the commission of similar offence and objected to grant interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the vehicle bearing Registration No. TN 60 BY 2713 is owned by the petitioner and he was not involved in any such offence as alleged by the respondent and if the vehicle is kept in open place, the vehicle will get deteriorated and the value of the vehicle would automatically stand diminished and therefore interim custody of the vehicle may be granted to the petitioner.

7. Considering the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and that no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is inclined to allow the revision thereby, setting aside the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.986 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the order dated 22.09.2025, passed in Crl.M.P.No. 986 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, is hereby set aside and the vehicle viz., Maruti Car bearing Registration No.TN 60 BY 2713, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concerned Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousan only) as non-refundable deposit for the said vehicle to the credit of WAA Cornelia Sorabjee Lecture Series, A/C No.6687756541, IFSC Code:IDIB000H040;

(b) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.1,75,000/-

(Rupees One Lakh and Seventy Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam;

(c) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam. If the original RC Book is in the custody of the finance company, the petitioner shall produce a photocopy of the RC Book, along with an affidavit stating that the original is with the finance company and a letter from the finance company acknowledging such custody.

(d) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent/

authority concerned stating that he will not use

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top