Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
S.Muthu – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by The Secretary, Youth Welfare and Sports Development (YW) Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review seeks to rectify order allowing appeal against writ. (Para 2) |
| 2. distinction from prior writ where employees not part-time. (Para 3) |
| 3. prior writs allowed then set aside; part-time ineligible for regularization. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. division bench approved g.o; review application dismissed. (Para 6) |
Heard both sides.
2.This application has been filed seeking review of the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by us allowing W.A(MD)Nos.1357 of 2019. The said writ appeal was filed by the Government questioning the order dated 26.03.2019 in W.P(MD)No.2470 of 2018. The said writ petition was filed by the review applicants. The review applicants had questioned the validity of G.O(Ms)No.79 Youth Welfare and Sports Department dated 19.12.2012 and for consequential relief of fixing them in regular time scale of pay. The writ petitioners were aggrieved by the fixation of a special time scale of pay. The writ petitioners had been appointed as part-time sweepers.
3.The learned counsel for the review applicants submitted that the order passed by us suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record and hence it deserves to be reviewed. Two facts need to be noted. The learned Sin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
