Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
Senthil Vadivu – Appellant
Versus
Ponnusamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of suit history and prior proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellant's arguments on non-binding prior decree (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court upholds binding effect of public pathway decree (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH SA. (MD)No.107 of 2007 and CRP Nos.920 and 921 of 2005 SA(MD) No.107/2007 Senthil Vadivu .. Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.
1.Ponnusamy
2.Sadayappan .. Respondents/defendants Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2004 in AS No.50/2003 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli, confirming the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2002 in OS No.52/1998on the file of the District Munsif Court, Musiri.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Rajakittu For Respondents : No appearance CRP(MD) Nos.920 and 921/2005 Senthil Vadivu .. Petitioner in both petitions Vs.
1.Ponnusamy
2.Sadayappan .. Respondents in both petitions Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 02.12.2004 in IA Nos.1044/2003 and 98/2004 in AS No.50/2003 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli.
For Appellant : Mr.V.R
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
