SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 30970

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
N Pushparaj – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Engineer And Administrative Officer Coimbatore Housing Unit – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Chandrasekar
For the Respondent(s): Mr.AM.Ravindranath Jeyapal, Standing Counsel

Mandamus directs execution of sale deed after full payment and No Objection for allotted housing.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution directing execution of a sale deed for an allotted house after full payment and obtaining a No Objection letter from the Government. Respondents allotted House No.MIG-B438 and received full payment but failed to execute the sale deed despite representations. The court directed execution upon verification of payment. Issue framed: Whether respondents must execute sale deed after full payment. Ratio: Full payment and No Objection entitle petitioner to sale deed execution without delay, considering representations made. Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to execute sale deed within 12 weeks if payment verified.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for sale deed execution. (Para 1)
2. hearing with petitioner’s payment and representation claims. (Para 2 , 3)
3. direct sale deed execution within 12 weeks if paid. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to execute a sale deed in respect of House No.MIG-B438, Ganapathy Neighbourhood Scheme, Coimbatore- 641 006 based on the petitioner’s representation dated 20.12.2025.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken for hearing at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents had allotted Flat bearing House No.MIG-B438 to the petitioner and he paid the entire amount to the respondents for the said allotment and also received ‘No Objection’ letter from the Government for execution of the sale deed. He further submitted that despite payment of the entire amount, the respondents failed to execute the sale deed for the said allotment in favour of the petitioner for which the petitioner made representations to the respondents on 27.07.2025 & 20.12.2025, which evoked no response and hence the present Writ Petition.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the respondents to execute the sale deed for the subject house/Flat allotment in favour of the petitioner, if the entire amount was paid by the petitioner by considering his representation dated 20.12.2025, within a period of

12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top