Public property allotments require transparent public auction; prior occupancy allows participation but no direct right.

ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the second respondent to allot one shop in the newly constructed complex of 18 shops at Natham Bus Stand, Natham, Dindigul District, based on his representation dated 09.12.2025.

2.The petitioner states that he was earlier running his business in a shop at the said location. The old shops were demolished for constructing a new complex, and therefore, he has requested that one shop be allotted to him in the newly constructed building.

3.The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that the petitioner does not have any legal right to claim direct allotment of a shop. It is also stated that the shops in the new complex will be allotted only through a public auction process.

4.It is settled that when public property such as shops belonging to a local body is to be allotted, it must be done through a fair and transparent method like public auction. This ensures equal opportunity to all and avoids any unfair advantage to a particular person. Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim allotment of a shop as a matter of right merely because he was previously occupying a shop. However, the fact that the petitioner was earlier carrying on business in the same place can be taken into consideration. He should be given an opportunity to participate in the auction and compete with others.

5.In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to participate in the auction to be conducted by the second respondent. If the petitioner participates, his bid shall be considered in accordance with law, and if any preference is permissible under the rules, the same may also be considered. No costs.