IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Liyakath Ali – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Thanjavur District. – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.8306 of 2026|W.M.P(MD)No.6801 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ disposed at admission without private notice (Para 2) |
| 2. site suitability per pollution guidelines questioned (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. mandate hearing of objector before final decision (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition is disposed of on the admission stage itself, without notice to the private respondents 9 and 10. This Court is not expressed any opinion with reference to the facts mentioned or the allegations made by the petitioner.
2.The prayer in the writ petition is to forebear the respondent Nos.1 to
8 from granting permission or license or No Objection Certificate for establishing a petroleum retail outlet in survey Nos.399/5B, 399/6A and 399/6B situated at Babarajapuram, Thimakudi Revenue Village, Kumbakonam taluk, Thanjavur District.
3.According to the petitioner, the site will not be suitable as per the Central Pollution Control Board guidelines, therefore, the petitioner has also made a representation and objections in this regard, but however, the respondents are proceeding further in considering the case.
4.When the matter came up for admission, the learned Special Government Pleader taking notice on behalf of the authorities would submit that for now only NOC of the District Fire and Rescue Services Officer alone is received and the District Revenue officer is considering the issue. The NOC is yet to be received from the other authorities, only there upon the final decision will be taken by the District Revenue Officer.
5.In view thereof, this writ petition is ordered on the following terms: (i)Let the petitioner shall also be heard by the 2nd respondent, while considering the application made with reference to the retail outlet in survey Nos.399/5B, 399/6A and 399/6B, Thimakudi Baburajapuram Village, Kumbakonam taluk, Thanjavur district and speaking order shall be passed on the objection submitted by the petitioner.
(ii)Needless to mention that the authority has to take a decision only by conducting an inquiry involving the respondent 9 and 10 as well as the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.