IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
E.Thadiveeran – Appellant
Versus
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (MDU) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notice taken and consent for disposal at admission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. covered by prior division bench judgments on interest. (Para 4) |
| 3. direct 6% interest on belated benefits within 12 weeks. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel on either side unanimously agree that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by various Judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) No.403 of 2010 and batch, dated 27.03.2014 and W.A.(MD) No.1419 of 2021 and batch, dated
26.07.2021.
5. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of gratuity, provident fund EL surrender salary and leave salary, from the date of his retirement till the date on which the terminal benefits are paid to the petitioner. The respondents are further directed to comply with the said direction as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.