SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31177

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
A.Neela W/o.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Thiruvallur District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Harikrishnan
For the Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP

Mandamus issued directing authority to consider representation on merits within 12 weeks after notice.

Headnote:First Paragraph: The petitioners filed a representation dated 16.03.2023 seeking confirmation of an order in Na. Ka. No. 3658 / 2021 / A4 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The representation requested rejection of an appeal before the District Revenue Officer. The court directed consideration without expressing opinion on merits. Second Paragraph: Issue framed as failure to consider the representation. Ratio decidendi: Authorities must dispose of representations on merits after notice within stipulated time in accordance with law. Third Paragraph: Writ petition disposed of with direction to 2nd respondent to consider and dispose representation within 12 weeks.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for considering representation to confirm order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent undertakes disposal within 12 weeks. (Para 3)
3. court directs consideration on merits with notice within 12 weeks; petition disposed. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.03.2023.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation was filed by the petitioner to reject the appeal filed before the 2nd respondent and confirm the order passed by the 3rd respondent. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

3. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent within a period of 12 weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2ndrespondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.03.2023 and dispose of the same, after issuing due notice to the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top