Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
A.Neela W/o.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Thiruvallur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks mandamus for considering representation to confirm order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent undertakes disposal within 12 weeks. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs consideration on merits with notice within 12 weeks; petition disposed. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.03.2023.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation was filed by the petitioner to reject the appeal filed before the 2nd respondent and confirm the order passed by the 3rd respondent. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.
3. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent within a period of 12 weeks.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2ndrespondent to consider the representation of the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
