Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Acsen Tex (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), The Competent Authority Land Acquisition, National Highways-68 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks solatium consideration per supreme court precedent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent agrees to dispose representation within 12 weeks. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs merits-based disposal without prejudice. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2022.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation was filed by the petitioner to disburse the statutory entitlement namely 30 percentage solatium with interest till the day of payment, in the light of judgment of Honble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Union of India and Another Vs Tarsem Singh and others, in Civil Appeal No. 7064 of 2019. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.
3. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the 1st respondent within a period of 12 weeks.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
5. In view of the above, wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
