SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31189

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Acsen Tex (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), The Competent Authority Land Acquisition, National Highways-68 – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Sudhakar
For the Respondent(s): M/s.P.Sathish,AGP For R1, M/s.Su.Srinivasan For R2

Court directs consideration of representation for 30% solatium and interest in land acquisition without merits opinion.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks disbursement of 30% solatium with interest under land acquisition laws, referencing Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh (Civil Appeal No.7064 of 2019). Facts involve a representation dated 17.08.2022 for statutory entitlements in National Highways-68 acquisition. Court finds representation pending consideration. Issue framed as directing consideration of representation for solatium and interest. Ratio emphasizes disposal on merits per law, without prejudging claims, within stipulated time. Writ petition disposed of with directions to 1st respondent to consider and dispose representation within 12 weeks.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks solatium consideration per supreme court precedent. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent agrees to dispose representation within 12 weeks. (Para 3)
3. court directs merits-based disposal without prejudice. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2022.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation was filed by the petitioner to disburse the statutory entitlement namely 30 percentage solatium with interest till the day of payment, in the light of judgment of Honble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Union of India and Another Vs Tarsem Singh and others, in Civil Appeal No. 7064 of 2019. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

3. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the 1st respondent within a period of 12 weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.08.2022 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top