Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
I.Saral – Appellant
Versus
The Account General, Office of Accountant General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to pension calculation excluding pre-training service. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. division bench ruling counts past service for pension. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. binding precedent directs revision of qualifying service. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR I.Saral ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Account General, Office of Accountant General
361, Annasalai, Chennai.
2.The Chief Educational Officer Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.
3.The District Educational Officer Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.
4.The Secretary Rukmani High School Mangalapuram Kadayanallur, Tenkasi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records in relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent in No.E22/12231177/1/R2231177 dated: 24.03.2025 in so far as calculating the pension for 24 years 1 month 0 days of service as illegal and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to revise the pension pay by taking the qualifying service as 32 years 0 months 0 days instead of 24 ye
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
