Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
S.Mekala – Appellant
Versus
The Account General Office of accountant General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to pension calculation excluding pre-training service. (Para 5 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. consideration of counsel contentions. (Para 6) |
| 3. reliance on prior division bench and coordinate bench rulings. (Para 7) |
| 4. no deviation from settled law; no need for clarification. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. writ allowed; direct revised pension order. (Para 11) |
5.The Secretary Khadir Mohideen Girls Higher Secondary School Adirampattinam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent in No.E22/12232959/2/R2232959/14 dated 28.08.2025 in so far as calculating the pension for 22 years 3 months 29 days of service as illegal and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to revise the pension pay by taking the qualifying service as 30 years 02 months 0 days instead of 22 years 03 months 29 days and disburse arrears and all other monetary benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For Respondents : Mrs.Chamundibose – for R1 Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar – for R2 & R3 Additional Govern
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
