Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
E.Boopalan – Appellant
Versus
Renu Ammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges trial court dismissal of impleadment in partition suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. sale deeds disclosed late; purchasers necessary parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. impleadment allowed as purchasers entered defendant's position post-written statement. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 20.02.2026 passed in IA No. 4 of 2026 in OS No. 155 of 2023 on the file of Subordinate judge Court, Katpadi, Vellore District.
2. The petitioners herein filed IA No. 4 of 2026 in OS No. 155 of 2023 on the file of Subordinate Judge Court, Katpadi, Vellore District under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking to implead the respondents 56 to 63/proposed parties as defendants in the main suit. But the Trial Court dismissed the said application stating if they were added as parties, opportunity is to be given to them to file written statement, hence it would drag on the proceedings. Further he observed that proposed parties have purchased the property after 10 years of the subject suit filed and in lis pendence. Therefore, they need not be impleaded.
Challenging the same, the petitioner filed this Civil Revision Petition.
3
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
