SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31337

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
K.Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Salem Electricity Distribution Circle, Udayapatti Salem-14 – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Nalliyappan
For the Respondents: Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla Standing Counsel for R1 to R3

Court directs electricity authorities to inquire survey number discrepancies and correct unauthorized connections.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner sought mandamus to disconnect unauthorized electricity connection on patta land. Petitioner alleged that fourth respondent used forged documents to obtain connection for Survey No.9/14, though well located in Survey No.462/3. Court found discrepancies in survey numbers and directed authorities to inquire and correct records. Second Paragraph: Issue framed as verification of survey numbers for electricity connection. Ratio decidendi: Authorities must conduct enquiry post-notice, verify documents from VAO/Tahsildar, and correct records accordingly. Last Paragraph: Writ petition disposed with directions for enquiry and correction; no costs.

Table of Content
1. petition alleges forged electricity connection on wrong survey number. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents agree to consider; arguments heard. (Para 3)
3. direct enquiry, notice, verify and correct survey numbers. (Para 5)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to disconnect the electricity service connection No.04-430-024-390 stands in the name of the 4th respondent in the petitioner’s patta land in SF. No.9/14 at Pattipadi Velur Village, Yercaud, Salem District within the reasonable time.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondent(s): Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla Standing Counsel for R1 to R3 R4 – No Appearance

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to disconnect the electricity service connection No.04-430-024-390 stands in the name of the 4th respondent in the petitioner’s patta land in SF. No.9/14 at Pattipadi Velur Village, Yercaud, Salem District

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the subject property and when he was in possession of the property, 4th respondent by producing forged and fabricated document obtained electricity service connection for the Survey No.9/14 which belongs to the petitioner herein. He would further submit that the 4th respondent obtained electricity connection for his Well situate in his land but, the survey number of the Well is different, which is 462/3 however, by referring the petitioner’s Survey No.9/14, 4th respondent obtained electricity service connection. Hence, the petitioner filed this writ petition.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the respondents will consider on those aspect and pass appropriate orders.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents

1 to 3. None appeared on behalf of the 4th respondent.

5. As per the averments of the petitioner, it appears that there is some discrepancies in the survey numbers in which the Well is situated. In such being the case, the respondent concerned is directed to conduct enquiry after giving notice to the 4th respondent and ascertain whether the Well is situated at Survey No.462/3 or Survey No.9/14 and accordingly, correct the same. In the event any document is produced by VAO or Tahsildar with regard to the survey numbers, after receipt of the same, the authority concerned shall take necessary steps to correct the survey numbers as per the documents. In the event none appears for the 4th respondent, it is open to the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top