IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
B.Mahendran – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Tamilnadu Forest Uniform Services, Recruitment Committee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. explains sequence causing filing delay. (Para 2) |
| 2. requires justifiable reasons for condonation. (Para 3 , 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 1390 days in filing the above writ appeal.
2. The reasons assigned in the application for such huge delay are after the disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner filed a review application seeking to review the order passed in the writ petition and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent herein has preferred a writ appeal and the said appeal was allowed as against the petitioner herein. In view of the aforesaid sequence of events, the delay in preferring the present writ appeal against the order passed in the writ petition has occasioned.
3.Ordinarily, the Court adopts a liberal approach while considering petitions for condonation of delay. At the same time, for extending such a liberal approach, there must be justifiable reasons. In the present case, the affidavit filed in support of the petition seeking condonation of such a huge delay is bereft of sufficient and satisfactory particulars explaining the inordinate delay.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.