Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
R.Sumathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented through The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Theni District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition to quash charges for fund swindling. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner denies knowledge; prosecution asserts prima facie case. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court refuses quashing, directs expeditious trial. (Para 5 , 7) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the third accused in C.C.No.421 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner is charged with offence under Sections 420 and 120(b) of I.P.C.
2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that third accused is the sister-
in-law of the first accused, who is working as the sheristadar in a Court. The primary allegation as against A1 is that he had swindled the entire amount that was deposited by the Insurance Company into the account of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and redirected the said amount into the account of the 3rd accused.
3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the third accused is residing away from the family of the first accused and she did not have any knowledge about using the bank account by the first accused. He further submitted that the entire amount has been returned and therefore, he p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
