SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
I.Vetrivel – Appellant
Versus
The Director, TANGEDCO, Accounts Branch, Anna Salai, Chennai. – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD)No.925 and 926 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to prior court order resolving the matter.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an order under Article 226 classifying its ready mix concrete activity as an industry for electricity tariff purposes, seeking assessment under Low Tension IIIB Tariff. The court noted the impugned Memo No.CFC/GL/Tf.Cell/AEE/F.Mixing Plant/D.1759/05 dated 20.08.2005. The court determined that due to a prior order, no further adjudication was required. The sole issue was the appropriateness of the electricity tariff classification. The court's reasoning relied on the earlier decision in W.P.(MD)No.20814 of 2014 rendering the petition infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.

O R D E R

In view of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.20814 of

2014, dated 24.03.2026, nothing survives for further adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top