SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
I.Vetrivel – Appellant
Versus
The Director, TANGEDCO, Accounts Branch, Anna Salai, Chennai. – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD)No.925 and 926 of 2021



Important Points

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to prior court order resolving the matter.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Act Referred

Headnote

The petitioner challenged an order under Article 226 classifying its ready mix concrete activity as an industry for electricity tariff purposes, seeking assessment under Low Tension IIIB Tariff. The court noted the impugned Memo No.CFC/GL/Tf.Cell/AEE/F.Mixing Plant/D.1759/05 dated 20.08.2005. The court determined that due to a prior order, no further adjudication was required. The sole issue was the appropriateness of the electricity tariff classification. The court's reasoning relied on the earlier decision in W.P.(MD)No.20814 of 2014 rendering the petition infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan

O R D E R

In view of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.20814 of

2014, dated 24.03.2026, nothing survives for further adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top