Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Radhakrishnan S/o.Angappan – Appellant
Versus
Thambidurai S/o.Angappan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions challenge dismissal of recall applications in decade-old suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners sought brief adjournment for cross-examination. (Para 3) |
| 3. court balances delay against fair cross-examination opportunity. (Para 4) |
| 4. revisions allowed; expedited suit disposal ordered. (Para 5 , 7) |
COMMON ORDER
The petitioners have filed these Civil Revision Petitions to set aside the fair and Decretal order passed in I.A Nos.624 & 625 of 2025, respectively in OS No.249 of 2014 dated 11.11.2025 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Villupuram.
2. Before the Trial Court, the defendants filed I.A. No.624 of 2025 and I.A. No.625 of 2025 in O.S. No.249 of 2014, seeking to reopen and to recall DW6 for cross-examination. The said applications were dismissed on the ground that the suit has been pending for more than 10 years and that the defendants had deliberately failed to cross-examine the witness, thereby attempting to prolong the proceedings. Aggrieved by the same, the present revisions have been filed by the defendants 2 & 10.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that on the date fixed for cross-examination, the junior counsel ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
