Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Arunprakash – Appellant
Versus
Sundarambal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision against dismissal of re-issuance; impleadment of purchaser upheld. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. suit for pathway declaration; commissioner report closed without objections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. objections mandatory before re-issuance per settled procedure. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. liberty granted to file objections; revision dismissed. (Para 8 , 9) |
Defendants 3 and 4 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.127 or 2022 in I.A.No.4 of 2021 in O.S.No.1 of 2021, dated 7.3.2023, on the file of District Munsif Court, Oddanchatram.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondent-1 : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondent-2 : Died For Respondent-3 : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondent-4 : No appearance
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.127 or 2022 in I.A.No.4 of 2021 in O.S.No.1 of 2021, dated 7.3.2023, on the file of District Munsif Court, Oddanchatram.
2.It is informed that the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent, Mr.Rathinasabapathy had alienated the property in favour of one Vasanathakannan, by way o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
