Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31527
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
K.Sumathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Writ Petition
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Vignesh
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekar, SGP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Vignesh
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekar, SGP
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission that orders passed and nothing survives.
Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct consideration of a representation. Facts involve a challenge to state authorities regarding recruitment or service matter. Court noted submission that orders passed, rendering matter infructuous. Issue framed as whether petition survives post orders. Ratio: Matter became infructuous upon submission by counsel that relief obtained. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders have been passed and therefore, nothing survives for the consideration and the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
