SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
K.Sumathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Vignesh
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekar, SGP

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders have been passed and therefore, nothing survives for the consideration and the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top