Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
K.Sumathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Writ Petition

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Vignesh
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekar, SGP

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission that orders passed and nothing survives.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct consideration of a representation. Facts involve a challenge to state authorities regarding recruitment or service matter. Court noted submission that orders passed, rendering matter infructuous. Issue framed as whether petition survives post orders. Ratio: Matter became infructuous upon submission by counsel that relief obtained. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders have been passed and therefore, nothing survives for the consideration and the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASP.T. ASHA, JK.Sumathi – AppellantVersusThe State Of Tamil Nadu – RespondentWrit Petition

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission that orders passed and nothing survives.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
K.Sumathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Writ Petition