SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Tvl.L.S.Textiles and Exports Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer (FAC), Karur-3 Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.P.(MD).No.7787 of 2026 | W.M.P(MD).No.6372 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

Ex-parte GST assessment under Section 74 remanded for fresh hearing upon tax payment and cooperation.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, the assessment order dated 21.08.2024 was passed ex-parte due to the petitioner's failure to avail opportunities. The petitioner challenged it as cryptic and illegal under Article 226. The court found discrepancies but noted tax realization, granting fresh opportunity. Second Paragraph: Whether ex-parte order under Section 74 warranted remand for hearing. The ratio is that ex-parte assessments require reconsideration upon showing cooperation and tax payment, ensuring natural justice. Third Paragraph: Impugned order set aside, remanded for fresh disposal with opportunity of hearing; bank account freeze lifted.

Table of Content
1. challenge to ex-parte gst assessment order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. grant opportunity for reconsideration. (Para 3)
3. remand with directions, freeze lifted. (Para 4)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD).No.6372 of 2026 Tvl.L.S.Textiles and Exports Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory S. Vijay Keerthi, GSTIN 33AABCL8434D1ZT, S.FNo. 141/13, South Punnam Village, Pugalur Taluk, Palamapuram, Karur – 639136. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State Tax Officer (FAC), Karur-3 Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Buildings, 2nd Floor, RDO Campus, North Pradhakshnam Road, Karur 639001.

2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST), Commercial Taxes Buildings, RDO Campus, North Pradhakshnam Road, Karur 639001. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in GSTIN - 33AABCL8434D1ZT/2019-20 dated 21/08/2024 for the assessment year 2019-20 passed by the Respondent under section 73 of TNGST Act 2017 and to quash the same as cryptic, non-speaking, illegal, arbitrary, wholly without jurisdiction and direct the 1st respondent to pass assessment order afresh after affording opportunity of being heard and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated

21.08.2024. The impugned order is an assessment order passed under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, made ex-parte, as the petitioner did not avail the opportunities.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the entire disputed tax amount has been realized.

3. Considering the nature of discrepancies and the submissions in respect thereto, I am of the view that an opportunity can be granted.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition is ordered on the following terms:-

(i) The impugned order dated 21.08.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the respondents for reconsideration.

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent authority without fail and produce such documents in support of his claim for exemption and thereupon the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

(iii) It is made clear that the petitioner shall cooperate for the expeditious determination of the assessment proceedings. The authority shall act upon the web copy of this order without waiting for the certified copy of the order.

(iv) It is also made clear that since the matter is remanded back for fresh disposal, freezing of the petitioner's bank account shall stand raised.

(v) No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top