SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Sarvodaya Ashram – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
W.P(MD) No.954 of 2019 | W.M.P.(MD)Nos.775 & 776 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai
For the Respondents:Mr.T.Ajmal Khan Government Advocate for R1 & R2

Writ petition disposed as infructuous due to prior order in connected case.

Headnote:First Paragraph: The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking certiorari to quash proceedings in Na.Ka. No. 11024/2017/A1 dated 15.01.2018. Essential facts involve challenge to an administrative order by revenue authorities. The court determined no further order required due to prior related proceedings. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was necessity of adjudication given the linked case. The ratio decidendi holds that prior orders in connected matters render subsequent petitions infructuous. Last Paragraph: Writ petition disposed of without costs.

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

In view of the order made in W.P.(MD)No.17689 of 2018, no further order is required in this writ petition. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top