Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
M. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
G. Mahalingam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to trial court order dismissing application to set aside commissioner's report. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue for reissuance due to improper execution and discrepancies. (Para 4) |
| 3. court sets aside order, directs reissuance of warrant for fair proof of encroachment. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.224 of 2024 in I.A.No. 490 of 2021 in O.S.No. 78 of 2014, by the Additional District Munsif Court, Chidambaram, the revision petitioners/plaintiffs preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. Considering the relief claimed challenging the order passed by the trial judge, notice to the respondents is dispensed with.
3. Before the trial court, the revision petitioners have filed the application to set aside the Commissioner’s report and to reissue the Commissioner warrant to the commissioner with the help of surveyor and to file a report and plan with clarity. On hearing both sides, the trial judge dismissed the application.
4. The learned counsel for revision petitioners would submit that on seeing the commissioner's report, he has not executed the warrant properly and there is a necessity to reissue the warrant to the same Advoca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
