SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31848

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Karthik Raja – Appellant
Versus
The District collector – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.03.2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD)No.6975 of 2026 Karthik Raja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to issue Hindu Kammar Schedule Tribe Community Certificate to the petitioner's Minor Children Rithun and Rithanya.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2.Mr.D.Sasikumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2.

3.This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the the third respondent to issue Hindu Kammar Schedule Tribe Community Certificate to the petitioner's Minor Children, namely Rithun and Rithanya.

4.It is the grievance of the petitioner that though he is a native of P.Chettiyapatti Village, Periyakattalai Village Panchayat, Usilampatti Taluk, the petitioner is presently residing in Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai Town. When the petitioner approached the third respondent seeking community certificate to his children on the basis of the community certificate issued to him, he was directed to approach the second respondent, as he is residing in Madurai town, presently. When he approached the second respondent, he redirected the petitioner to approach the third respondent. Therefore, it is the contention of the petitioner that in view of the directions given by the second and third respondents, he is not in a position to get the community certificates for his children. Hence, he seeks an appropriate direction.

5.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents would submit that the third respondent is the competent authority to consider the application submitted by the petitioner seeking issuance of community certificate, since the petitioner is a native of the Usilampatti.

6.In view of the above said submission, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh application to the third respondent within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such application is being made, the third respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders within a period of one (1) month thereafter.

7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.]

13.03.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ta To

1.The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

ta W.P.(MD)No.6975 of 2026

13.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top