IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
Ragini @ Aruna – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and proof of involvement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. exclusive jurisdiction of special courts for custody issues. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. principles governing natural justice and custody rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER
Heard Mr.R.Jothiraj, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner and Mr.C.Arulvadivel @ Sekar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Respondent.
2. Present Criminal Revision Case has been filed to set aside the order passed by Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur, in Crl.M.P.No.2991 of 2025 by an order dated 06.08.2025, whereby the petition filed under Sections 497 and 503(2) of BNSS for interim custody of vehicle bearing Reg.No. TS.33-H-0549, was rejected.
3. Mr.R.Jothiraj, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner would submit that petitioner claims to be the owner of the vehicle, viz., White Colour Suzuki Brezza Car bearing Registration No.TS.33-H-0549. The said vehicle was seized by the Respondent and a case was registered in NCB.F.No.48/01/07/2025/NCB-MDS, for the offence under Sections 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c), 28 and 29 of NDPS Act, alleging that the said vehicle was involved in transportation of p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.