SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14874

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
M/s. Guru Shoe Components an – Appellant
Versus
Goods and Services Tax Counc – Respondent


O R D E R

The petitioner is a manufacturer of Insoles, presently registered as a dealer under the provisions of the Puducherry Goods and Services Taxes Act, 2017 (PGST Act), prior to which it was a dealer under the provisions of the Puducherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007 (PVATAct).

2. With the enactment of the PGST Act with effect from 01.07.2017, the petitioner had made an attempt to transition/migrate existing credit available under the VAT scheme to the GST portal. Section 139 of the PGST Act provides for migration of existing tax payers. As per the procedure set out for migration, existing dealers who held a valid PAN were provided with a provisional user ID and password, generated by the Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN)/R2.

3. The user ID and password constitute mandatory requirements for enrolling under the GST Scheme and are required to login into the GST portal. Upon completion of the registration process using the user (provisional) ID, the same becomes the GSTN for the purposes of GST.

4. The petitioner states that since no provisional ID was received from GSTN, it proceeded to utilise an ID using random units that, admittedly, has no basis and was defective. Using this ID,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top