SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3763

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.01.2020 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P(MD)NO.26983 OF 2019 Dharani Muthukumar :Petitioner .vs.

1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

3.The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No. 9407/C3/2019,dated 12.6.2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the first respondent to permit the Petitioner to re-install the statue of Dr.Bhimarao Ramji Ambedkar at Adi Dravidar Colony, Sudaroli Nagar, Kuppagudi Village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

For Petitioner :Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondents :Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi Special Govt.Pleader

O R D E R

*************

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No. 9407/C3/2019,dated 12.6.2019 as illegal and consequently to direct the first respondent to permit the Petitioner to re-install the statue of Dr.Bhimarao Ramji Ambedkar at Adi Dravidar Colony, Sudaroli Nagar, Kuppagudi Village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.The subject-matter issue relates to installation of a statue of Dr.Bhimarao Ramji Ambedkar at Adi Dravidar Colony, Sudaroli Nagar,Kuppagudi Village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. The impugned order came to be passed in view of the pendency of the issue before the Honourable Supreme Court. The Honourable Supreme Court also passed an order on 13.09.2011 in the case of Union of India(UOI) .vs. State of Gujarat and others made in SLP(C)No.8519/2006 and W.P(C)No.314 of 2010. As per the said judgment, the paragraph Nos.6 and 7 relates to the State of Tamil Nadu, which reads as follows:

STATE OF TAMIL NADU

6.The Chief Secretary of the State of Tamil Nadu has filed an affidavit in which it is stated that there are 77.453 unauthorized religious structures on public lands in the State of Tamil Nadu. Learned counsel for the State Submits that the Government of Tamil Nadu has formulated a policy for removal , relocation and regularization of the unauthorized encroachments of public lands. He prays for time to file the present status report.

7.Let an affidavit be filed by the Chief Secretary within three weeks, mentioning therein as to whether the policy has been implemented and also indicating that out of the total number of unauthorized religious structures, how many of them have been removed, relocated or regularized. A copy of the policy also be placed on record.

4.Pursuant to the said direction, a Government Order in G.O.

(Ms)No.183, Revenue Department, Land Disposal Wing(L.D. 4(1))Section, dated 23.5.2017 was issued and para 8(ii) of the said Government Order, reads as under:

''8.The Government after careful examination have decided to issue the procedures to be followed and ordered as detailed below:-

I)...........................

ii)It should,however, be borne in mind that, the Honourable Supreme Court in SLP(C)8519/2006 has ordered that the State Government shall not grant any permission for installation of any statute or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.''

5.The impugned order only states that the installation of the statue was sought for in the land allotted by the Government for Adi-Dravidars. It does not say whether the Petitioner attempted to instal the statue on public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.

6.As there is no clarity in the order, the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No. 9407/C3/2019,dated 12.6.2019 is set aside and the same is remanded back to the first respondent to consider the matter afresh in the light of the order of the Honourable Supreme Court 13.09.2011 in the case of Union of India(UOI) .vs. State of Gujarat and others made in SLP(C)No.8519/2006 and W.P(C)No.314 of

2010 as well as G.O.(Ms)No.183, Revenue Department, Land Disposal Wing(L.D.4(1))Section, dated 23.5.2017, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner and others concerned, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 29.01.2020 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn To

1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

3.The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

vsn

0RDER MADE IN W.P(MD)NO.26983 OF 2019

29.01.2020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top